The Brexit dispute exploded as David Frost’s tactics angered Michel Barnier: “ Count ahead! ” | UK | New
Lord Frost is in Brussels today to discuss the fight against Northern Ireland during a dinner with European Commission Vice-President Maros Sefcovic. The implementation of the Northern Ireland protocol remains a tense issue, as the EU has angered the UK for extending a waiver on checks on certain goods entering Belfast from Britain. Brussels argued that this decision was in contradiction with international law. This is not the first time that the Northern Ireland Protocol has caused tension between the EU and the UK.
Speaking to an audience at the Free University of Brussels on February 17, 2020, Lord Frost made it clear that he wanted the UK to end negotiations with “a huge advantage over the EU – the ability to define regulations for new sectors, new ideas, and new conditions ”.
A British official said there was an “account to come” – warning of the heated clash that would follow.
Last year, the government released its Home Market Bill, aimed at rescinding the Withdrawal Agreement by making changes to the Northern Ireland Protocol.
Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis even admitted in parliament that it could break the law.
Negotiators Lord Frost and Michel Barnier were in the midst of tense Brexit talks when the move came, and infuriated the EU negotiator.
As the Guardian reported, an EU official was taken aback by the policy, admitting that “Barnier was astonished”.
Another EU source simply said, “What the fuck is this?”
When Mr. Barnier then met Mr. Frost, he asked him, “Is that what you are doing?” How can we continue? I have to go back to the Member States who are all going to ask themselves why are we continuing to negotiate? “
The Irish government official later attacked the government as well, saying it was absolutely unacceptable for London to go ahead without notifying Dublin.
READ MORE: EU brought back to ‘dire reality’ as European rail loses £ 22bn
She told Michael Gove: “It ruined the relationship – unforgivable,” according to an official in attendance.
Eventually, Brussels and London agreed on a protocol, paving the way for a Brexit trade deal to be reached late last year.
The deal was implemented, but failed to quash the disagreement as Brussels launches infringement proceedings against the UK.
As it stands, the lawsuit is still ongoing and could end up in court if the government continues to resist the Brussels infringement procedure.
Infringement proceedings involve the European Commission sending a letter of formal notice to the UK regarding the alleged breach of the Withdrawal Agreement and setting a deadline for responding.
EU embroiled in ‘so much bitterness’ as Brexit feud erupts [INSIGHT]
EU wanted to make Brexit as ‘painful as possible’ [ANALYSIS]
Macron ‘lost his temper’ with Johnson in ‘furious’ phone call on Covid [INSIGHT]
If Brussels deems the response unsatisfactory, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) may be involved in the case.
If the CJEU rules against the UK, it can issue a court ruling asking the government not to cancel the Withdrawal Agreement.
The EU can ask that the UK be fined if the government refuses to comply.
On a recent episode of the Brexit Republic podcast, Tony Connelly, RTE’s editor-in-chief for Europe, said the EU would ask the UK for a ‘roadmap’ towards complying with Ireland’s protocol. North.
He continued: “The UK should produce this roadmap, on that basis they clearly know how they intend to implement this protocol.
“We were able to attend an informal meeting between David Frost and Maros Sefcovic to give things a little boost.
“The lawsuit will continue of course, but the EU lawsuit continues on its merry way and if the UK comes back into compliance, the lawsuit dies quietly on the vine. “